Old 19-11-2009, 07:08 PM   #21
Jedi Chat Master
 
David T-W's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The wonderful world of north Kent
Posts: 1,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gothika85 View Post
I'd hardly say its a 'demise' of language. Language is forever changing. We don't speak the same English now, as we did a hundred years ago. Sentences are grammatically altered & words are gained & lost all the time.
I admit, I hate certain parts of colloquial English. For example, I hate double negatives. I'm also not too fond of the glotteral stop. Sounds weird to me.

But, I never call people on it & it doesn't bother me enough to avoid it.
I'm sure my Idionisms (sp?) annoy plenty of people.
The reason I say "demise" is because too few people even care any more. And yes, of course, change is necessary and normal. But shouldn't change come through some reason other than people not being arsed to get it right?
David T-W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19-11-2009, 07:32 PM   #22
Jedi Chat Master
 
Gothika85's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Liverpool
Posts: 1,092
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David T-W View Post
The reason I say "demise" is because too few people even care any more. And yes, of course, change is necessary and normal. But shouldn't change come through some reason other than people not being arsed to get it right?
That I agree with. There are a lot of people who don't care about the English language, but are the first to say, "Bloody foreigners!! They should learn English." Or, "If people want to live here, then they should learn our language." etc.....

To be honest, modern language is the way it is because people 'can't be arsed.' For example, I'm sure you've used words like, 'isn't,' 'wasn't', 'can't' rather than the longer, 'is it not/it is not, 'was it not/was not' etc...
They're the product of English speakers who couldn't be arsed.

Btw, foreigners only speak 'proper English' because they were taught how to speak formally.
I can only really speak French formally.
But, there is a legitimate form of French called 'verlan.'
From what I gather, speakers change sentences & words around. I think you'd really have to speak to someone like Phil to understand exactly how its formed.

As long as people are understood, what is the problem?
As long as we still have literature, formal English will never be really lost.

Last edited by Gothika85; 19-11-2009 at 07:45 PM.
Gothika85 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 10:26 AM   #23
Jedi Chat Master
 
David T-W's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: The wonderful world of north Kent
Posts: 1,662
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Gothika85 View Post
That I agree with. There are a lot of people who don't care about the English language, but are the first to say, "Bloody foreigners!! They should learn English." Or, "If people want to live here, then they should learn our language." etc.....

To be honest, modern language is the way it is because people 'can't be arsed.' For example, I'm sure you've used words like, 'isn't,' 'wasn't', 'can't' rather than the longer, 'is it not/it is not, 'was it not/was not' etc...
They're the product of English speakers who couldn't be arsed.

Btw, foreigners only speak 'proper English' because they were taught how to speak formally.
I can only really speak French formally.
But, there is a legitimate form of French called 'verlan.'
From what I gather, speakers change sentences & words around. I think you'd really have to speak to someone like Phil to understand exactly how its formed.

As long as people are understood, what is the problem?
As long as we still have literature, formal English will never be really lost.
I have a vested interest in people (magazine and book publishers, mainly) wanting language to be right. It keeps me in work. So, by virtue of that, I should be happy that people don't know grammar and language. But it still irks me when people who should know better (magazine editors, news anchors etc) don't know better.

But I do think there is a difference (and a big one) between formal English and incorrect usage. You can speak/write correctly without being formal, of course.

As to contractions, I do believe that is different. They may have come about as a result of not caring, but I don't think so. However, not caring where people put the apostrophe in a contraction is a sin, naturally. How many times have you seen "does'nt" instead of "doesn't", for example? Millions!
David T-W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20-11-2009, 07:50 PM   #24
graysilva
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by David T-W View Post

However, not caring where people put the apostrophe in a contraction is a sin, naturally.
i own 17 antique bibles. Bin frew a cupple n ca'nt find this bit! You got a copy i do'nt?

  Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New Skin Deep Web site and forum. Neil Website Feedback and News 18 15-11-2009 08:00 PM
Skin Deep and your local Newsagent davidgamble This month's Skin Deep and Skin Shots Magazine 2 06-10-2009 10:47 AM
Skin Deep <original> Robbiebarra Chit Chat 6 05-04-2006 07:00 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:25 AM.


Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.5.0